The identification of cloned papers is significantly at internet site operations. The work discusses a methodology to identify hijacked journals based on activities analysis of cloned journals. The methodology is most significant in classifying a system of cloned publications that had similar organizations. Cloned journals archives are analysed which allows to identify 50 URLs of cloned journals, which offers the prospect to classify two fake internet page before it operationally functional. This learning reveals that most identified hijacked journals signify a system of cloned journals managed by one or various fraudulent persons. We surveyed various cloned journals, out of which 510 to be specific, to examine the consequences and causes publications to be cloned. Burden to publish research papers in indexed publisher, fast publications and difficult identifying a hijacked journal, are some of various deviation that led scholars to publish articles in cloned journals. It was stimulating to note that contempt the authors identifying that they have come across the consequences of research publications.