Transition of Flow Past Five Square Obstacles in Tandem Arrangement at Distinct Gap Spacing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/ks.v12i4.3614Keywords:
Drag and lift coefficients, Steady flow, Force statistics, square obstacles, Gap spacingAbstract
A two-dimensional (2-D) numerical simulation was performed for the flow past five square obstacles of similar size ‘D’ aligned inline at fixed Reynolds number Re = 150 to investigate the transition in flow behavior. The gap spacing (gc = s/D) between the obstacles was varied from gc = 0.25 to 5. The results were obtained in terms of vorticity contour visualization, time-history analysis of drag (Cd) and lift (Cl) forces, and physical parameters. Four different flow modes were identified under the effect of gap spacing (gc = s/d). These are: i) Shear layer flow mode ii) Half-developed irregular vortex shedding flow mode iii) Fully-developed two-row vortex shedding flow mode iv) Two-row single bluff body flow mode for obstacles C1-C5. The values of Cdmean, Cdrms, Clrms, and St were calculated for physical parameters. Cdmean exhibited a mixed trend with increasing gap spacing for obstacles C3, C4, and C5. The highest value of Cdmean was observed at gc = 5 for obstacle C1, which was 1.4594, while the smallest value was attained for obstacle C3 at gc = 0.25. There were also some negative values of Cdmean for obstacle C2 at gc = 0.25 - 2.25 and for obstacle C3 at gc = 0.25 - 1.25 due to the effect of pressure, known as thrust. Furthermore, the Strouhal number showed an increasing trend for both small and large gap spacings, i.e., gc = 0.25 - 0.75 and gc = 1.5 – 5. The highest value of the Strouhal number was observed at gc = 5 for obstacle C5, which was 0.1521.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Raheela Manzoor, Shazia Kalsoom, Tyyaba Kalsoom, Farida Panezai, Neelam Panezai, Naveed Sheikh, Muhammad Yasin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.