Intersex Inheritance Law in the Light of Rabbinic Literature

Authors

  • Sadia Maryam
  • Muhammad Hayat Khan
  • Sami ul Haq
  • Muhammad Shafiq ur Rehman
  • Bushra Bibi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/ks.v12i4.3612

Keywords:

Intersex, androgynous, Judaism, inheritance, tumtum, LGBTQI

Abstract

Intersex individuals, defined by ambiguous sexual characteristics that challenge traditional binary gender categories, often face significant societal exclusion and denial of basic rights. This article explores the religious teachings of Judaism regarding inheritance rights for intersex individuals, referred to as tumtum (with indeterminate sexual traits) and androgynous (having both male and female characteristics), in rabbinic literature. Drawing from foundational texts such as the Mishnah, Talmud, and Halakhic rulings, the article examines how Jewish law accommodates intersex individuals within the framework of biblical inheritance laws. The study focuses on how rabbinic authorities have defined intersex individuals' rights about sons and daughters, outlining circumstances where they may inherit like sons and daughters or be excluded entirely. The article underscores these laws' ethical considerations and societal implications by analyzing the nuanced approaches of Jewish teachings. This study sheds light on the interplay between tradition, gender identity, and justice, offering insights into Jewish religious perspectives' inclusive yet complex nature on inheritance.

Author Biographies

Sadia Maryam

IRS, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan

Muhammad Hayat Khan

IRS, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan

Sami ul Haq

Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Sheringal, Pakistan

Muhammad Shafiq ur Rehman

GCMS, Abbottabad, Pakistans

Bushra Bibi

IRS, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan

Downloads

Published

2024-08-19

How to Cite

Sadia Maryam, Muhammad Hayat Khan, Sami ul Haq, Muhammad Shafiq ur Rehman, & Bushra Bibi. (2024). Intersex Inheritance Law in the Light of Rabbinic Literature. Kurdish Studies, 12(4), 1713–1718. https://doi.org/10.53555/ks.v12i4.3612