Assessing The Effectiveness, Complications, And Recurrence of Flat Colonic Polyps After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR)

Authors

  • Shahid Iqbal
  • Kamran
  • Mushtaq Ahmad
  • Zubia Zia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/ks.v10i2.3320

Keywords:

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, Sessile Polyps, Saline-assisted polypectomy

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a significant advancement in treating early cancers of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract.

Objective: To evaluate the Effectiveness, complication, and recurrence of flat colonic polyps following endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

Methods: A prospective trial was conducted in Lady Reading and Khyber Teaching Hospitals of Peshawar, Pakistan from Jan 2021 to Jan 2023.

Results: A total of 243 polyps were resected in 211 patients. 23 patients had more than one polyp. The mean age was 45±13 years. En-bloc resection was possible in 240 patients (98.8%). Bleeding immediately after resection was seen among 6 patients (2.84%) while delayed bleeding after 24 hours after the procedure occurred in 8 patients (3.8%). Perforation occurred in one patient. The recurrence rate was 9 % (18/205) during a follow-up of 12 months.

Conclusion: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection is an effective and safe outpatient procedure for sessile or flat colonic polyps.

 

Author Biographies

Shahid Iqbal

Senior Registrar, Department of Gastroenterology, Jinnah Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan

Kamran

Senior Registrar, Department of Gastroenterology, Jinnah Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan

Mushtaq Ahmad

Senior Registrar, Gastroenterology Division, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan

Zubia Zia

Associate Professor, Baqai Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Baqai Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Shahid Iqbal, Kamran, Mushtaq Ahmad, & Zubia Zia. (2022). Assessing The Effectiveness, Complications, And Recurrence of Flat Colonic Polyps After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR). Kurdish Studies, 10(2), 501–504. https://doi.org/10.53555/ks.v10i2.3320

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)