Application of Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution in the Crime of Fraud

Abstract

This article examines the importance of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the administration of justice. They focus on fostering dialogue and cooperation between the parties, seeking solutions that come closer to the real interests and needs of the people involved, rather than relying solely on the law. Speed in dispute resolution, prompt settlement or comprehensive redress, continuity in the implementation of agreed agreements, review by the competent authority, confidentiality of the parties and focus on the economy of the process are highlighted as fundamental aspects of ADR, there is a lack of clarity in its application in cases of fraud. The research employs a mixed approach, including surveys and bibliographical analysis, and concludes that the lack of regulation of conciliation in cases of fraud harms the victims. Expert methods and theoretical analysis were used to process the information.